On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 09:20:33AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:41:28AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > > Yes, so until we have proper header for zImage, these patches looks > > fine to me. > > If you read my last email in the "kexec failures with DEBUG_RODATA" > thread, you'll see that I'm unhappy with this idea, because adding a > "proper header" still results in some kind of assumption about how > the zImage decompressor works being needed by the boot environment. > > > For both of the patches: > > > > Reviewed-by: Pratyush Anand <panand at redhat.com> > > Thanks. > > Simon, do you need me to resend with the r-b tag, or will you pick > these two up and the documentation fix patch you asked for? Thanks for reminding me about this, I have applied this patch and the other one you mention.
