Rob,
[Cc: Mark]
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 08:26:41AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 10:57:47AM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > From: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
> >
> > Add documentation for
> > linux,crashkernel-base and crashkernel-size,
> > linux,usable-memory-range, and
> > linux,elfcorehdr
> > used by arm64 kexec/kdump to decribe the kdump reserved area, and
> > the elfcorehdr's location within it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse at arm.com>
> > [takahiro.akashi at linaro.org:
> > renamed "usable-memory" to "usable-memory-range",
> > added "linux,crashkernel-base" and "-size" ]
> > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt
> > index 6ae9d82..236188a 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/chosen.txt
> > @@ -52,3 +52,53 @@ This property is set (currently only on PowerPC, and only needed on
> > book3e) by some versions of kexec-tools to tell the new kernel that it
> > is being booted by kexec, as the booting environment may differ (e.g.
> > a different secondary CPU release mechanism)
> > +
> > +linux,crashkernel-base
> > +linux,crashkernel-size
> > +----------------------
> > +These properties (currently used on PowerPC and arm64) indicates
> > +the base address and the size, respectively, of the reserved memory
> > +range for crash dump kernel.
> > +e.g.
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + chosen {
> > + linux,crashkernel-base = <0x9 0xf0000000>;
> > + linux,crashkernel-size = <0x0 0x10000000>;
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +linux,usable-memory-range
> > +-------------------------
> > +
> > +This property (currently used only on arm64) holds the memory range,
> > +the base address and the size, which can be used as system ram on
> > +the *current* kernel. Note that, if this property is present, any memory
> > +regions under "memory" nodes in DT blob or ones marked as "conventional
> > +memory" in EFI memory map should be ignored.
> > +e.g.
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + chosen {
> > + linux,usable-memory-range = <0x9 0xf0000000 0x0 0x10000000>;
> > + };
> > +};
>
> I've read the discussion on this. I think you should use the existing
> linux,usable-memory property in the memory nodes. If UEFI systems don't
> have memory nodes, then you can find an UEFI way to describe this. DT is
> not the dumping ground for what doesn't fit in UEFI. How do x86 systems
> work?
Kdump for x86 passes the range of usable memory to crash dump kernel
either via:
(a) "memmap=nn at ss" command line parameter, or
(b) faked BIOS e820 map (a sort of memory map table)
(a) was rejected by Mark [1], and (b) is x86-specific.
I believe that my approach is better because it works in the same way
either on UEFI systems or DT-based systems.
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-January/400122.html
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
> Rob
