Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 09 August 2016, 09:01:13 schrieb Mimi Zohar:
>> On Tue, 2016-08-09 at 20:59 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> > Mimi Zohar <zohar at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> > > b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> > > index b5728da..84e8d36 100644
>> > > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> > > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
>> > > @@ -102,6 +102,13 @@ struct ima_queue_entry {
>> > >
>> > > };
>> > > extern struct list_head ima_measurements; /* list of all
> measurements
>> > > */
>> > >
>> > > +/* Some details preceding the binary serialized measurement list */
>> > > +struct ima_kexec_hdr {
>> > > + unsigned short version;
>> > > + unsigned long buffer_size;
>> > > + unsigned long count;
>> > > +} __packed;
>> > > +
>> >
>> > Am I understanding it correctly that this structure is passed between
>> > kernels?
>> Yes, the header prefixes the measurement list, which is being passed on
>> the same computer to the next kernel. Could the architecture (eg.
>> LE/BE) change between soft re-boots?
>
> Yes. I am able to boot a BE kernel from an LE kernel with my patches.
> Whether we want to support that or not is another question...
Yes you must support that. BE -> LE and vice versa.
You should also consider the possibility that the next kernel is not
Linux.
cheers
