On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 09:21:02AM +0000, ???? / KAWAI?HIDEHIRO wrote:
> So, the problem for you is that "noextnmi" option is visible and effective
> in the first kernel, isn't it?
No, such an option shouldn't exist at all. You should be passing
information *in* *a* *different* *manner* to the kdump kernel - not with
a kernel command line option.
I get the feeling I'm starting to sound like a broken record on this
mail thread... :-(
One other thing we could probably try to do is use boot_params which
is, IIUC, passed to the second kernel. So we can add another bit to
boot_params.hdr.loadflags or so and use that. Or something similar.
Not particularly crazy about it but it is still much better than a
command line param...
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
