Hello,
On 01/27/2015 04:19 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:23:34AM +0000, Geoff Levand wrote:
>> Add runtime checks that fail the arm64 kexec syscall for situations that would
>> result in system instability do to problems in the KVM kernel support.
>> These checks should be removed when the KVM problems are resolved fixed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoff at infradead.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
>> index 3d84759..a36459d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@
>> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>> #include <asm/system_misc.h>
>>
>> +/* TODO: Remove this include when KVM can support a kexec reboot. */
>> +#include <asm/virt.h>
>> +
>> /* Global variables for the relocate_kernel routine. */
>> extern const unsigned char relocate_new_kernel[];
>> extern const unsigned long relocate_new_kernel_size;
>> @@ -100,6 +103,13 @@ int machine_kexec_prepare(struct kimage *image)
>>
>> kexec_image_info(image);
>>
>> + /* TODO: Remove this message when KVM can support a kexec reboot. */
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM) && is_hyp_mode_available()) {
>> + pr_err("%s: Your kernel is configured with KVM support (CONFIG_KVM=y) which currently does not allow for kexec re-boot.\n",
>> + __func__);
>> + return -ENOSYS;
>> + }
>
> If you really don't want to implement KVM teardown, surely this should
> be at the start of the series, so we don't have a point in the middle
> where things may explode in this case?
I'm going to fix this KVM issue (teardown) in cooperation with Geoff.
Looking into kvm init code, kvm_arch_init() in particular,
I guess that teardown function (kvm_arch_exit()) should do
(reverting kvm_timer_hyp_init() per cpu)
- stop arch timer
(reverting cpu_init_hyp_mode() per cpu)
- flush TLB
- jump into identical mapping (using boot_hyp_pgd?)
- disable MMU?
- restore vbar_el2 to __hyp_stub_vectors (or NULL?)
(reverting kvm_mmu_init())
- Do we need to free page tables and a bounce(trampoline) page?
Is this good enough for safely shutting down kvm?
Do I miss anything essential, or can I skip anyhing?
I really appreciate your comments.
-Takahiro AKASHI
> Mark.
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
