Hi Simon,
ping.
Could you please have a look at this patch and merge it if you think
it's OK?
Thanks
Baoquan
On 10/29/14 at 04:19pm, Baoquan He wrote:
> In ppc64 loading, it will print the segment information. This is not
> wanted since other Archs don't have this. People even think there's
> something wrong. So erase it to make it be consistent with other Archs.
>
> And if people really want to check these info, they can specify "-d"
> option. They are printed in print_segments() too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe at redhat.com>
> ---
> kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c b/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c
> index ce10367..4a1540e 100644
> --- a/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c
> +++ b/kexec/arch/ppc64/kexec-elf-ppc64.c
> @@ -377,10 +377,6 @@ int elf_ppc64_load(int argc, char **argv, const char *buf, off_t len,
> dbgprintf("opal_base is %llx\n", (unsigned long long) my_opal_base);
> dbgprintf("opal_entry is %llx\n", (unsigned long long) my_opal_entry);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < info->nr_segments; i++)
> - fprintf(stderr, "segment[%d].mem:%p memsz:%zu\n", i,
> - info->segment[i].mem, info->segment[i].memsz);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
