Yang,
On 12/11/2015 03:44 AM, Shi, Yang wrote:
> On 12/3/2015 5:58 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 02/12/15 22:40, Ashwin Chaugule wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> On 24 November 2015 at 17:25, Geoff Levand <geoff at infradead.org> wrote:
>>>> From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
>>>>
>>>> The current kvm implementation on arm64 does cpu-specific initialization
>>>> at system boot, and has no way to gracefully shutdown a core in terms of
>>>> kvm. This prevents, especially, kexec from rebooting the system on a boot
>>>> core in EL2.
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds a cpu tear-down function and also puts an existing cpu-init
>>>> code into a separate function, kvm_arch_hardware_disable() and
>>>> kvm_arch_hardware_enable() respectively.
>>>> We don't need arm64-specific cpu hotplug hook any more.
>>>>
>>>> Since this patch modifies common part of code between arm and arm64, one
>>>> stub definition, __cpu_reset_hyp_mode(), is added on arm side to avoid
>>>> compiling errors.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi at linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 10 ++++-
>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 1 +
>>>> arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>>> arch/arm/kvm/mmu.c | 5 +++
>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 16 +++++++-
>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 1 +
>>>> arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 9 +++++
>>>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp-init.S | 33 ++++++++++++++++
>>>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp.S | 32 ++++++++++++++--
>>>> 9 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> static struct notifier_block hyp_init_cpu_pm_nb = {
>>>> @@ -1108,11 +1119,6 @@ static int init_hyp_mode(void)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> - * Execute the init code on each CPU.
>>>> - */
>>>> - on_each_cpu(cpu_init_hyp_mode, NULL, 1);
>>>> -
>>>> - /*
>>>> * Init HYP view of VGIC
>>>> */
>>>> err = kvm_vgic_hyp_init();
>>>
>>> With this flow, the cpu_init_hyp_mode() is called only at VM guest
>>> creation, but vgic_hyp_init() is called at bootup. On a system with
>>> GICv3, it looks like we end up with bogus values from the ICH_VTR_EL2
>>> (to get the number of LRs), because we're not reading it from EL2
>>> anymore.
>>
>> Indeed, this is completely broken (I just reproduced the issue on a
>> model). I wish this kind of details had been checked earlier, but thanks
>> for pointing it out.
>
> Sorry for chiming in late. I did run into something similar when I tested some earlier version patches with Akashi San.
>
> The guest bootup just hangs with 4.1 kernel on my LS2085 board which has GICv3. Not sure if this is the same issue. But,
> my bisect did point to this patch.
Can you please try my fixup! patch to determine whether it is the same issue or not?
Thanks
-Takahiro AKASHI
> I used to think it is my kernel's problem (4.1 sounds a little bit old) since Akashi San can't reproduce this on his
> Hikey board.
>
> Thanks,
> Yang
>
>>
>>> Whats the best way to fix this?
>>> - Call kvm_arch_hardware_enable() before vgic_hyp_init() and disable later?
>>> - Fold the VGIC init stuff back into hardware_enable()?
>>
>> None of that works - kvm_arch_hardware_enable() is called once per CPU,
>> while vgic_hyp_init() can only be called once. Also,
>> kvm_arch_hardware_enable() is called from interrupt context, and I
>> wouldn't feel comfortable starting probing DT and allocating stuff from
>> there.
>>
>>> - Read the VGIC number of LRs from the hyp stub?
>>
>> That's may UNDEF if called in the wrong context. Also, this defeats the
>> point of stubs, which is just to install the vectors for the hypervisor.
>>
>>> - ..
>>
>> Yeah, quite.
>>
>> Geoff, Takahiro?
>>
>> M.
>>
>
