[PATCH REPOST 1/2] kexec: implement -y (--no-sync) option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] kexec: implement -y (--no-sync) option
From: tj@xxxxxxxxxx (Tejun Heo)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 22:42:34 -0400
In-reply-to: <20150415010908.GB28632@verge.net.au>
References: <20150326191608.GE1953@htj.duckdns.org> <20150326191644.GF1953@htj.duckdns.org> <20150413170156.GH2596@htj.duckdns.org> <20150414002944.GB10790@verge.net.au> <20150414121509.GJ2596@htj.duckdns.org> <20150415010908.GB28632@verge.net.au>

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote:
>> Heh, weird.  Let's see if it goes through this time.
>
> Indeed. I have the patches this time.
> They both look good and I have applied them.

Awesome, thanks!

-- 
tejun

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] kexec: implement -y (--no-sync) option
  - From: Tejun Heo
- [PATCH 2/2] kexec: remove ordering constraints from -x (--no-ifdown) and -y (--no-sync)
  - From: Tejun Heo
- [PATCH 2/2] kexec: remove ordering constraints from -x (--no-ifdown) and -y (--no-sync)
  - From: Tejun Heo
- [PATCH 2/2] kexec: remove ordering constraints from -x (--no-ifdown) and -y (--no-sync)
  - From: Simon Horman
- [PATCH REPOST 1/2] kexec: implement -y (--no-sync) option
  - From: Tejun Heo
- [PATCH REPOST 1/2] kexec: implement -y (--no-sync) option
  - From: Simon Horman

Prev by Date: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] kexec: implement -y (--no-sync) option
Next by Date: [PATCH v10 0/10] iommu/vt-d: Fix intel vt-d faults in kdump kernel
Previous by thread: [PATCH REPOST 1/2] kexec: implement -y (--no-sync) option
Next by thread: arm64 kexec hang
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LM Sensors] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [ALSA Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux