> > Seems reasonable-I'm wondering why you just don't call panic() in this > > case. The BUG() call at line '434' doesn't at anything since its just being > > called from panic.c. > > Hmm ... I didn't even think about that. > > > > > So something like 'panic_on_warn' would seem to be more appropriate > > in keeping with things like 'panic_on_oops' or 'panic_on_stackoverflow'. > > I like it a lot better that way too :) I'm changing it to panic_on_warn unless > anyone has any strenuous objections. I would vote for panic_on_warn, it will make more sense than bug_on_warn. Thanks Dave
