On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 05:19:06 +0000
Atsushi Kumagai <kumagai-atsushi at mxc.nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> >On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 10:55:07 +0100 (a/T)
> >HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama at jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH 2/2] makedumpfile: Use max_pfn from mem_map array
> >> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 17:14:20 +0100
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >> > With this patch makedumpfile gets the maximum page frame number from
> >> > the mem_map array and adjusts info->max_mapnr if this value is smaller
> >> > than the value calculated from the ELF header.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > makedumpfile.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > --- a/makedumpfile.c
> >> > +++ b/makedumpfile.c
> >> > @@ -2829,7 +2829,8 @@ get_mem_map_without_mm(void)
> >> > int
> >> > get_mem_map(void)
> >> > {
> >> > - int ret;
> >> > + unsigned long max_pfn = 0;
> >> > + int ret, i;
> >>
> >> Please define max_pfn as unsigned long long.
> >
> >Ok done.
> >
> >>
> >> And for i,
> >>
> >> >
> >> > switch (get_mem_type()) {
> >> > case SPARSEMEM:
> >> > @@ -2861,6 +2862,17 @@ get_mem_map(void)
> >> > ret = FALSE;
> >> > break;
> >> > }
> >> > + /*
> >> > + * Adjust "max_mapnr" for the case that Linux uses less memory
> >> > + * than is dumped. For example when "mem=" has been used for the
> >> > + * dumped system.
> >> > + */
> >> > + for (i = 0; i < info->num_mem_map; i++) {
> >>
> >> info->num_mem_map is defined as unsigned int. I guess some warning
> >> about comparison with different signedness occurs.
> >
> >Ah ok...
> >
> >With the default CFLAGS for makedumpfile-1.5.5 tarball I do not get
> >any warning. When I add "-W" to CFLAGS, I get lots of warnings
> >including the one you mentioned.
> >
> >Here the fixed patch:
>
> Thanks, I'll merge the fixed version into v1.5.6.
Great!
Thanks for your support!
Michael
