Currently when an empty PT_NOTE is detected, vmcore initialization fails. It sounds too harsh. Because PT_NOTE could be empty, for example, one offlined a cpu but never restarted kdump service, and after crash, PT_NOTE program header is there but no data contains. It's better to warn about the empty PT_NOTE and continue to initialise vmcore. And ultimately the multiple PT_NOTE are merged into a single one, all empty PT_NOTE are discarded naturally during the merge. So empty PT_NOTE is not visible to user space and vmcore is as good as expected. Signed-off-by: WANG Chao <chaowang at redhat.com> --- fs/proc/vmcore.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/vmcore.c b/fs/proc/vmcore.c index 88d4585..dc71bf9 100644 --- a/fs/proc/vmcore.c +++ b/fs/proc/vmcore.c @@ -484,7 +484,6 @@ static int __init update_note_header_size_elf64(const Elf64_Ehdr *ehdr_ptr) phdr_ptr->p_memsz = real_sz; if (real_sz == 0) { pr_warn("Warning: Zero PT_NOTE entries found\n"); - return -EINVAL; } } @@ -671,7 +670,6 @@ static int __init update_note_header_size_elf32(const Elf32_Ehdr *ehdr_ptr) phdr_ptr->p_memsz = real_sz; if (real_sz == 0) { pr_warn("Warning: Zero PT_NOTE entries found\n"); - return -EINVAL; } } -- 1.8.5.3