On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:24:59PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> Emm.. I'm not sure, but I think there might be a chance that
> COMMAND_LINE_SIZE extend in the future. In general 8K is safe to use,
> because the current greatest one is 4K.
Sure, but kexec cannot load a kernel of different arch, can it?
Which means, we're safe using the arch-specific definition of
COMMAND_LINE_SIZE.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
