The pesign utility had a bug where it was using OID_msIndividualSPKeyPurpose instead of OID_msPeImageDataObjId - so allow both OIDs. Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com> Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com> --- crypto/asymmetric_keys/mscode_parser.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/mscode_parser.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/mscode_parser.c index 09336c3..214a992 100644 --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/mscode_parser.c +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/mscode_parser.c @@ -58,7 +58,13 @@ int mscode_note_content_type(void *context, size_t hdrlen, return -EBADMSG; } - if (oid != OID_msIndividualSPKeyPurpose) { + /* + * pesign utility had a bug where it was putting + * OID_msIndividualSPKeyPurpose instead of OID_msPeImageDataObjId + * So allow both OIDs. + */ + if (oid != OID_msPeImageDataObjId && + oid != OID_msIndividualSPKeyPurpose) { pr_err("Unexpected content type OID %u\n", oid); return -EBADMSG; }