(2014/01/23 18:47), Baoquan He wrote: > @@ -3301,18 +3301,15 @@ set_bitmap(struct dump_bitmap *bitmap, unsigned long long pfn, > } > > int > -set_bitmap_cyclic(char *bitmap, unsigned long long pfn, int val) > +set_bitmap_cyclic(char *bitmap, unsigned long long pfn, int val, struct cycle *cycle) > { > int byte, bit; > > - if (pfn < info->cyclic_start_pfn || info->cyclic_end_pfn <= pfn) > - return FALSE; > - Removing this check changes behaviour, not just clean up, so should be separated into another patch. Further, this change seems buggy because, in addition to Kumaga-san's comment, memory outside of cycle region can be passed to here. Please look at the below. > @@ -4782,10 +4780,10 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages_cyclic(void) > if (mmd->mem_map == NOT_MEMMAP_ADDR) > continue; > > - if (mmd->pfn_end >= info->cyclic_start_pfn && > - mmd->pfn_start <= info->cyclic_end_pfn) { > + if (mmd->pfn_end >= cycle->start_pfn && > + mmd->pfn_start <= cycle->end_pfn) { > if (!__exclude_unnecessary_pages(mmd->mem_map, > - mmd->pfn_start, mmd->pfn_end)) > + mmd->pfn_start, mmd->pfn_end, cycle)) > return FALSE; > } > } After this clean up, __exclude_unnecessary_pages() processes memory within cycle region only. So, it's necessary to pass adjusted range, like: if (MAX(mmd->pfn_start, cycle->start_pfn) < MIN(mmd->pfn_end, cycle->end_pfn)) __exclude_unnecessary_pages(mmd->mem_map, MAX(mmd->pfn_start, cycle->start_pfn), MIN(mmd->pfn_end, cycle->end_pfn)) -- Thanks. HATAYAMA, Daisuke