On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:41:31 -0500 Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:59:10PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > >[...] > > > > ... > > > > > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kexec.h b/include/uapi/linux/kexec.h > > > index d6629d4..5fddb1b 100644 > > > --- a/include/uapi/linux/kexec.h > > > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kexec.h > > > @@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ > > > #define KEXEC_PRESERVE_CONTEXT 0x00000002 > > > #define KEXEC_ARCH_MASK 0xffff0000 > > > > > > +/* Kexec file load interface flags */ > > > +#define KEXEC_FILE_UNLOAD 0x00000001 > > > +#define KEXEC_FILE_ON_CRASH 0x00000002 > > > > BIT() > > What's that? #define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr)) For my part I'm not convinced it's a better way to do it, unless Borislav also wanted to suggest adding an enum for the bit number values... Petr T
