On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 09:12:26AM +0800, Zhang Yanfei wrote:
> On 02/04/2014 08:41 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 05:31:51PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 09:30:47AM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 02:23:04PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> >>>
> >>> [..]
> >>>>> Simon what do you think? A kexec-tools release every 4 months or every
> >>>>> 6 months. Does it make sense to you?
> >>>>
> >>>> Perhaps we could aim for every second kernel release and see how that goes?
> >>>
> >>> Sounds Good. Kernel releases are roughly 3 months apart. So that would
> >>> mean a kexec-tools release roughly around 6 months. This sounds like
> >>> a good start.
> >>>
> >>> So 3.13 was release recently. And last kexec-tools release was in march
> >>> 2013. May be it is a good idea to do one release now and then next one
> >>> can be after release of kernel 3.15, 3.17 and so on.
> >>
> >> Yes, I think so too.
> >
> > Would any of you object to me doing this with the current state of the
> > tree as of fe2c38cc0fc32573 ("Avoid buffer overflow on strncat usage").
> >
>
> NO objection.
Done :)
