>Description: >In create_dump_bitmap, after prepare_bitmap2_buffer_cyclic was invoked, >info->partial_bitmap2 will pointed to a block of contiguous memory. But >free it in a wrong way because what free_bitmap2_buffer() free is >info->bitmap2 not info->partial_bitmap2. > >Signed-off-by: Arthur Zou <zzou at redhat.com> Good catch, Thanks! >--- > makedumpfile.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c >index ce4a866..f0d2997 100644 >--- a/makedumpfile.c >+++ b/makedumpfile.c >@@ -5143,7 +5143,8 @@ create_dump_bitmap(void) > > info->num_dumpable = get_num_dumpable_cyclic(); > >- free_bitmap2_buffer(); >+ if (info->partial_bitmap2 != NULL) >+ free(info->partial_bitmap2); I think it's better to create free_bitmap2_buffer_cyclic() for this. BTW, write_kdump_pages_and_bitmap_cyclic() also have the same mistake: struct cycle cycle = {0}; for_each_cycle(0, info->max_mapnr, &cycle) { if (!create_1st_bitmap_cyclic(&cycle)) return FALSE; if (!write_kdump_bitmap1_cyclic(&cycle)) return FALSE; } free_bitmap1_buffer(); What we should do here is to free partial_bitmap1, so we should create free_bitmap1_buffer_cyclic() and call it here instead. Luckily, this mistake is harmless due to the free() at the end of main(): if (info->partial_bitmap1 != NULL) free(info->partial_bitmap1); if (info->partial_bitmap2 != NULL) free(info->partial_bitmap2); Now, I think it's better to remove these free(), it's possible if partial_bitmap1 and partial_bitmap2 are freed in write_kdump_pages_and_bitmap_cyclic() or write_elf_pages_cyclic(). So could you fix your patch based on my comments? Thanks Atsushi Kumagai