[PATCH RESEND v5 04/10] x86, cleanup: add_memmap() only do alignment check on RANGE_RAM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Could you please explain why this is necessary.

Also, it seems to me that it would make sense to move this
patch so that is is immediately after patch 2 in the series.

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:23:25AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
> Signed-off-by: WANG Chao <chaowang at redhat.com>
> ---
>  kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c b/kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c
> index 43eb8f7..4072c10 100644
> --- a/kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c
> +++ b/kexec/arch/i386/crashdump-x86.c
> @@ -482,8 +482,8 @@ static int add_memmap(struct memory_range *memmap_p, int *nr_memmap_p,
>  	int i, j, nr_entries = 0, tidx = 0, align = 1024;
>  	unsigned long long mstart, mend;
>  
> -	/* Do alignment check. */
> -	if ((addr%align) || (size%align))
> +	/* Do alignment check if it's RANGE_RAM */
> +	if ((type == RANGE_RAM) && ((addr%align) || (size%align)))
>  		return -1;
>  
>  	/* Make sure at least one entry in list is free. */
> -- 
> 1.8.5.3
> 



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux