On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 04:21:27PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 16:38:47 -0400
> Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 01:51:44PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> > > >>> START QUOTE
> > >
> > > [PATCH v3 1/3] kdump: Introduce ELF header in new memory feature
> > >
> > > Currently for s390 we create the ELF core header in the 2nd kernel
> > > with a small trick. We relocate the addresses in the ELF header in
> > > a way that for the /proc/vmcore code it seems to be in the 1st
> > > kernel (old) memory and the read_from_oldmem() returns the correct
> > > data. This allows the /proc/vmcore code to use the ELF header in
> > > the 2nd kernel.
> > >
> > > >>> END QUOTE
> > >
> > > For our current zfcpdump project (see "[PATCH 3/3]s390/kdump: Use
> > > vmcore for zfcpdump") we could no longer use this trick. Therefore
> > > we sent you the patches to get a clean interface for ELF header
> > > creation in the 2nd kernel.
> >
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > Few more questions.
> >
> > - What's the difference between zfcpdump and kdump. I thought zfcpdump
> > just boots specific kernel from fixed drive? If yes, why can't that
> > kernel prepare headers in similar way as regular kdump kernel does
> > and gain from kdump kernel swap trick?
>
> Correct, the zfcpdump kernel is booted from a fixed disk drive. The
> difference is that the zfcpdump HSA memory is not mapped into real
> memory. It is accessed using a read memory interface "memcpy_hsa()"
> that copies memory from the hypervisor owned HSA memory into the Linux
> memory.
>
> So it looks like the following:
>
> +----------+ +------------+
> | | memcpy_hsa() | |
> | zfcpdump | <-------------- | HSA memory |
> | | | |
> +----------+ +------------+
> | |
> | old mem |
> | |
> +----------+
>
> In the copy_oldmem_page() function for zfcpdump we do the following:
>
> copy_oldmem_page_zfcpdump(...)
> {
> if (src < ZFCPDUMP_HSA_SIZE) {
> if (memcpy_hsa(buf, src, csize, userbuf) < 0)
> return -EINVAL;
> } else {
> if (userbuf)
> copy_to_user_real((buf, src, csize);
> else
> memcpy_real(buf, src, csize);
> }
> }
>
> So I think for zfcpdump we only can use the read() interface
> of /proc/vmcore. But this is sufficient for us since we also provide
> the s390 specific zfcpdump user space that copies /proc/vmcore.
>
> > Also, we are accessing the contents of elf headers using physical
> > address. If that's the case, does it make a difference if data is
> > in old kernel's memory or new kernel's memory. We will use the
> > physical address and create a temporary mapping and it should not
> > make a difference whether same physical page is already mapped in
> > current kernel or not.
> >
> > Only restriction this places is that all ELF header needs to be
> > contiguous. I see that s390 code already creates elf headers using
> > kzalloc_panic(). So memory allocated should by physically contiguous.
> >
> > So can't we just put __pa(elfcorebuf) in elfcorehdr_addr. And same
> > is true for p_offset fields in PT_NOTE headers and everything should
> > work fine?
> >
> > Only problem we can face is that at some point of time kzalloc() might
> > not be able to contiguous memory request. We can handle that once s390
> > runs into those issues. You are anyway allocating memory using
> > kzalloc().
> >
> > And if this works for s390 kdump, it should work for zfcpdump too?
>
> So your suggestion is that copy_oldmem_page() should also be used for
> copying memory from the new kernel, correct?
Yes.
>
> For kdump on s390 I think this will work with the new "ELF header swap"
> patch. With that patch access to [0, OLDMEM_SIZE] will uniquely identify
> an address in the new kernel and access to [OLDMEM_BASE, OLDMEM_BASE +
> OLDMEM_SIZE] will identify an address in the old kernel.
>
> For zfcpdump currently we add a load from [0, HSA_SIZE] where p_offset
> equals p_paddr. Therefore we can't distinguish in copy_oldmem_page() if
> we read from oldmem (HSA) or newmem. The range [0, HSA_SIZE] is used
> twice. As a workaroun we could use an artificial p_offset for the HSA
> memory chunk that is not used by the 1st kernel physical memory. This
> is not really beautiful, but probably doable.
Ok, zfcpdump is a problem because HSA memory region is in addition to
regular memory address space.
Yep trying to figure out unused memory region in first kernel and mapping
HSA to that is little ugly. But you know s390 better, so you decide
whether you want to take that path or not. Generic code does not care
what p_offset is pointing to.
If you decide not to do that, agreed that copy_oldmem_page() need to
differentiate between reference to HSA memory and reference to new
memory. I guess in that case we will have to go with original proposal
of using arch functions to access and read headers. I guess we can
export physical address of elf headers to generic code and when
generic code reads from that address using arch function we can read
from new memory. copy_oldmem_page() will read from HSA memory for
anything less than HSA_SIZE and from real memory for anything above
it.
Other way could the to use lower bits of p_offset field to store
additional info. But that would make generic code ugly.
>
> When I tried to implement this for kdump, I noticed another problem
> with the vmcore mmap patches. Our copy_oldmem_page() function uses
> memcpy_real() to access the old 1st kernel memory. This function
> switches to real mode and therefore does not require any page tables.
> But as a side effect of that we can't copy to vmalloc memory. The mmap
> patches use vmalloc memory for "notes_buf". So currently using our
> copy_oldmem_page() fails here.
>
> If copy_oldmem_page() now also must be able to copy to vmalloc memory,
> we would have to add new code for that:
>
> * oldmem -> newmem (real): Use direct memcpy_real()
> * oldmem -> newmem (vmalloc): Use intermediate buffer with memcpy_real()
> * newmem -> newmem: Use memcpy()
>
> What do you think?
Yep, looks like you will have to do something like that.
Can't we map HSA frames temporarily, copy data and tear down the mapping?
If not, how would remap_pfn_range() work with HSA region when
/proc/vmcore is mmaped()?
Thanks
Vivek
