On Mon, 27 May 2013 09:27:42 +0800 Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > ___ 2013___05___27___ 09:27, HATAYAMA Daisuke ______: > > (2013/05/26 9:58), Zhang Yanfei wrote: > >> ___ 2013___05___26___ 07:20, Eric W. Biederman ______: > >>> Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes at gmail.com> writes: > >>> > >>>> From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei at cn.fujitsu.com> > >>> > >>> Won't we want to keep this reservation around to so that this number > >>> doesn't get reused, and cause people confusion when > >>> upgrading/downgrading kernels? > >> > >> Ah, yes. I will just keep this and add a note to make people know that > >> it is removed in the next version. > >> > > > > It looks enough writing "obsolete" according to the other parts of the same file. > > > > I've sent the v2 version and actually did what you said. I can't find any v2 version of this patchset. I did this: --- a/Documentation/devices.txt~dev-oldmem-remove-the-interface-fix +++ a/Documentation/devices.txt @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ Your cooperation is appreciated. export the buffered printk records. 12 = /dev/oldmem Used by crashdump kernels to access the memory of the kernel that crashed. + (obsolete) 1 block RAM disk 0 = /dev/ram0 First RAM disk _
