? 2013?05?27? 09:46, HATAYAMA Daisuke ??: > (2013/05/26 15:36), Zhang Yanfei wrote: >> From: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei at cn.fujitsu.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei at cn.fujitsu.com> >> Cc: Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devices.txt | 3 +-- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devices.txt b/Documentation/devices.txt >> index 08f01e7..c8e4002 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devices.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devices.txt >> @@ -100,8 +100,7 @@ Your cooperation is appreciated. >> 10 = /dev/aio Asynchronous I/O notification interface >> 11 = /dev/kmsg Writes to this come out as printk's, reads >> export the buffered printk records. >> - 12 = /dev/oldmem Used by crashdump kernels to access >> - the memory of the kernel that crashed. >> + 12 = /dev/oldmem OBSOLETE >> >> 1 block RAM disk >> 0 = /dev/ram0 First RAM disk >> > > This is the new patch. Looking at other parts of devices.txt, obsolete is > sometimes used together with unused. I guess obsolete means this is old interface so > don't use it as much as possible and unused means this is not used at all now. > You remove old memory interface completely in this patch set, so is it better to add > unused, too? > Does obsolete also mean "not used anymore"? I don't know. I think we can wait for some native English speakers to comment on this. Thanks Zhang
