On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 15:38 -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > For general-purpose (i.e. distro) kernel builds it makes sense to build with > CONFIG_KEXEC to allow end users to choose what kind of things they want to do > with kexec. However, in the face of trying to lock down a system with such > a kernel, there needs to be a way to disable kexec (much like module loading > can be disabled). Without this, it is too easy for the root user to modify > kernel memory even when CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM and modules_disabled are set. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook at chromium.org> Giving Sys admins more control to secure their system is a good idea. This addition looks good to me. -- Khalid
