On 11/27/13 at 04:37pm, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: > (2013/11/27 14:37), Baoquan He wrote: > >On 11/26/13 at 03:12am, Atsushi Kumagai wrote: > >>Hello Baoquan, > >> > >>I also prefer v1 because the usage of update_cyclic_region_without_exclude() is > >>definite and understandable while v2's update_cyclic_region() is complicated. > >> > >>On the other hand, I agree with your opinion, so could you post a cleanup patch > >>separately from v1 patch ? > > > >Hi Atsushi, > > > >Yeah, you are right, v1 is better. Then we can wait for HATAYAMA's cleanup > >patch. I know you are goint to release v1.5.5. > > > > I don't have a time to make a clean-up patch now, at least within this year. OK, I will try to post a clean-up patch based on your cycle loop method. But I can not guarantee the completion date. > > -- > Thanks. > HATAYAMA, Daisuke > > > _______________________________________________ > kexec mailing list > kexec at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
