On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 10:44:31AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:15:09AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 08:48:58AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 01:46:58PM +0800, Dave Young wrote: > > > > On 04/06/2013 04:16 AM, Don Zickus wrote: > > > > > A common problem with kdump is that during the boot up of the > > > > > second kernel, the hardware watchdog times out and reboots the > > > > > machine before a vmcore can be captured. > > > > > > > > > > Instead of tellling customers to disable their hardware watchdog > > > > > timers, I hacked up a hook to put in the kdump path that provides > > > > > one last kick before jumping into the second kernel. > > > > > > > > > > The assumption is the watchdog timeout is at least 10-30 seconds > > > > > long, enough to get the second kernel to userspace to kick the watchdog > > > > > again, if needed. > > > > > > > > For kdump kernel some devices need to reset, this might increase the > > > > boot time, it's not so reliable for the 10-30s for us to kicking the > > > > watchdog. > > > > > > > > Could we have another option to disable/stop the watchdog while panic > > > > happens? Ie. add a kernel cmdline panic_stop_wd=<0|1> for 1st kernel, if > > > > it's set to 1, then just stop the watchdog or we can kick the watchdog > > > > like what you do in this patch. Of course stopping watchdog should be > > > > lockless as well.. > > > > > > Hmm, I can look into that. But I am not sure all watchdogs have the > > > ability to stop once started. I was also worried about the case where > > > > Correct. > > > > > kdump hangs for some reason. Having the watchdog there to 'reboot' would > > > be a nice safety net. > > > > > Absolutely agree. After all, the reason for the kdump is most likely that > > something went really wrong, meaning there is some likelyhood for the hang > > to occur. Turning off the watchdog in this condition does not seem to be > > a good idea. > > > > > Perhaps adjusting the watchdog 'timeout' to something like 3 minutes would > > > be easier? > > > > > Not all watchdogs support such large timeouts, unfortunately. Maybe it would > > make sense to implement infrastructure support for a softdog on top of the > > hardware watchdog. Several drivers implement that outside the infrastructure > > already. > > Hi Guenter, > > I am not familar with a softdog. Can you give me an example of how it > works? > Just look for the use of mod_timer in the watchdog directory. Guenter
