On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:32:19PM +0900, HATAYAMA Daisuke wrote: [..] > BTW, I feel you basically shows positive attitude to this patch set > itself. I believe that kdump has merits only. Could you tell me what > is needed for this patch set to be acked by you? I don't have any objections to bringing up more than 1 cpu in second kernel. Somebody who needs the code better in this area needs to provide by Reviewed-by/Acked-by though. Thanks Vivek
