On 08/11/2012 11:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 08/11/2012 11:26 AM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: >>> >>> This patch from Jacob Shin solves the problem, and seems like it might >>> be a better solution. >>> >>> [PATCH 2/5] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that >>> are being mapped >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/9/540 >>> >> Actually, apply that series of 5 patches. >> > > I was hoping Tejun would comment on it, but I think I'll pull it into -tip. > > However, the real question is what we should do for -stable; applying > the full patch series seems a big aggressive for that. On the other > hand, if it really is The Right Thing then perhaps we should do so anyway. > Ah, right... still waiting for a rev of the patch to address Yinghai's legitimate request for minor code restructuring. Other than that, the patchset is really The Right Thing. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
