On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm at xmission.com> wrote: > Michael Holzheu <holzheu at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > >> Hello Vivek, >> >> In our tests we ran into the following scenario: >> >> Two CPUs have called panic at the same time. The first CPU called >> crash_kexec() and the second CPU called smp_send_stop() in panic() >> before crash_kexec() finished on the first CPU. So the second CPU >> stopped the first CPU and therefore kdump failed. >> >> 1st CPU: >> panic()->crash_kexec()->mutex_trylock(&kexec_mutex)-> do kdump >> >> 2nd CPU: >> panic()->crash_kexec()->kexec_mutex already held by 1st CPU >> ? ? ? ?->smp_send_stop()-> stop CPU 1 (stop kdump) >> >> How should we fix this problem? One possibility could be to do >> smp_send_stop() before we call crash_kexec(). >> >> What do you think? > > smp_send_stop is insufficiently reliable to be used before crash_kexec. > > My first reaction would be to test oops_in_progress and wait until > oops_in_progress == 1 before calling smp_send_stop. > +1 One of my colleague mentioned the same problem with me inside RH, given the fact that the race condition window is small, it would not be easy to reproduce this scenario. Thanks.
