On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:35:03AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:04:06AM +0800, Am?rico Wang wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Am?rico, > > > > > > I'm not sure that I understand your question, but > > > 920f4ededd9627add3ca1cdea965d204f2ca43a7 is the HEAD of the master > > > (development) branch. ?And unless I am mistaken, it is a descendent of v2.0.2. > > > > > > > Yeah, so `git describe HEAD` should show v2.0.2-BLAHBLAH, not > > v1.101-618-g920f4ed, right? > > Yes, I think so. I'm rather unsure why it isn't. > However, the following does seem to give a result more in line with > expectations. Are you creating annotated tags or lightweight tags? That might be the difference. Cheers, Don
