On 12/05/2011 10:44 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:32:38AM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> +static inline void lock_system_sleep(void)
>> +{
>> + /* simplified freezer_do_not_count() */
>> + current->flags |= PF_FREEZER_SKIP;
>> + mutex_lock(&pm_mutex);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void unlock_system_sleep(void)
>> +{
>> + mutex_unlock(&pm_mutex);
>> + /* simplified freezer_count() */
>> + current->flags &= ~PF_FREEZER_SKIP;
>> +}
>
> BTW, don't we want try_to_freeze() there? What's the reason for not
> using freezer_count()?
>
I wanted these APIs to be generic, not restricted to work only for userspace
processes. Both freezer_do_not_count() and freezer_count() are effective only
when current->mm is non-NULL (ie., only for userspace ones).
I think I have documented this in the patch which added these things to the
2 APIs. See commit 6a76b7a in linux-pm/linux-next.
As for try_to_freeze(), we can surely add that. I think I missed it while
open-coding the relevant part of freezer_count(). I'll send it as a separate
patch. Thank you very much.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
