Hello Vivek, On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 09:20 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 02:53:20PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote: > > [...] > > > although I am a little unclear about the status of the kernel side of > > > things. Please let me know if you would like me to merge the kexec-tools > > > patches now or wait a bit (for an updated version?). > > > > I think that we are almost done with the discussion. I will send you my > > current kexec-tools patches and would be glad, if you could integrate > > them now. > > I guess kexec-tools integration will make more sense once kernel patches > show up atleast in one maintainer's subtree. The s390 kexec-tools kdump code will inactive as long a kernel shows "Crash kernel" in /proc/iomem. So IMHO there is little risk to integrate the code. > Also in kernel patches, atleast we need to resolve the issue of arch > specific kmap(), kunmap() calls so that we don't have to make > kimage_load_crash_segment() arch specific. As I told in my last mail we will do this later. So I think there are currently no more open issues, correct? Michael
