On 10/21/2010 02:10 PM, Alok Kataria wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 13:26 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> On 10/21/2010 12:09 PM, Alok Kataria wrote: >>> >>> I don't think this patch was picked up for tip, now that the 2.6.37 >>> merge window is open can you please pick this up push it upstream. >>> This patch fixes a legitimate regression, which was introduced during >>> 2.6.30, by commit id 4ef702c10b5df18ab04921fc252c26421d4d6c75. >>> >> >> It probably would have helped if the patch had had a proper patch header >> and so on, and *in particular* not buried in a tree with [RFC PATCH]. >> RFC strongly implies that the patch is intended as a base for >> discussion, and is explicitly not intended to be committed. > > I see, I have sent another mail with the patch. > I already took the patch and am running it through compile tests, but that was mostly for future reference. -hpa
