On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:26 PM, Maxim Uvarov wrote: > I'm ok with that changes. I'm not sure why kernel did not turn this > optimization off and goes > with compiling crt.s with sources. There could be a reasons for that. > More likely to not put anything from > libgcc to kernel. We should do the same for purgatory code. So maybe > it's reasonable > to apply my patch and go the same way as kernel goes (but it will > break old compilers, that should not > be huge problem.) > Wait, do your recent patches have a similar effect? -M
