Hi,
kexec-tools version 2.0.1 works well on my machine. thanks very much.
kernel version still 2.6.28.10. :)
but under in the file kexec-tools-2.0.1/News, i dont see any changes.
I'm interested in it , where can i find this info ? thanks
jencce
2010/6/10 Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au>
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 02:33:14PM +0800, ?? wrote:
> > hello everyone,
> > sorry to bother you. I have a problem with kexec tools. when i
> > use it on a ia64 machine, it does't work.
> > situation 1 : after executing "kexec -l ***" and "kexec -e" ,
> > many "cpu # is now offline" printed out, then the system lose response.
> > situation 2 (mostly): after many "cpu # is now offline"
> printed
> > out, some warn info printed out , and then a call trace.. system lose
> > response... warn info is : Unexpected irq vector 0x44 on cpu 11! .. ..
> > call trace has info like : fixup_irqs , take_cpu_down, etc..
> > Is there something wrong with my current kernel ? but it is an
> > usual 2.6.28.10. Does kexec support IA64 fully?
> > Thanks alot. bow. :)
>
> Hi,
>
> 2.6.28 should be new enough, but is it possible to check
> using a more recent kernel (e.g. 2.6.34) and the latest kexec-tools
> (2.0.1)?
>
> If the problem persists, then a copy of the stack trace would be useful.
> I usually collect these by using a serial console.
>
> Thanks.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/attachments/20100611/21cf1d56/attachment.html>
