On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Can we please do this the other way around and create a kexec_user.h? > > Having a an xxx_user.h is a pattern we already have in the kernel. > > I can't find a signle xxxx_kernel.h > > If you do that you have to change the man page. > > Or just keep my simple patch. It seems more logical to me to update the documentation - its new documentation, isn't it?
