On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 07:00:47PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:16:28PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > > To add to this, my understanding is that kexec support varies across > > different ARM platforms - that is to say, it works on some and fails on > > others. While this seems to be slowly improving, I'm also aware of any list > > of what is supported and what isn't. > > I'm unaware of that; the only area of weakness with kexec that I'm > aware of is when the ARMv7 processor support didn't implement the > necessary code to bring the caches/mmu/tlbs into a safe state for > software-reboot, which is also what's required by kexec. Ok, I could well be mistaken and its just ARMv7 that has a few issues at this time.
