kdump regression compared to v2.6.35

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
From: tj@xxxxxxxxxx (Tejun Heo)
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:52:25 +0200
In-reply-to: <1236896997.1479691283083005518.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
References: <1236896997.1479691283083005518.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>

On 08/29/2010 01:56 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
> It is easy to reproduce by passing maxcpus=1 to the first kernel.

Do you mean booting w/ maxcpus=1 hangs the first kernel even w/o
kdump?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Follow-Ups:
- kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
  - From: CAI Qian

References:
- kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
  - From: CAI Qian

Prev by Date: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Next by Date: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Previous by thread: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Next by thread: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LM Sensors] [Linux Sound] [ALSA Users] [ALSA Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Media] [Kernel] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux