On Jan 12, 2009, at 12:24 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 02:42:38PM -0600, Milton Miller wrote: >> Follwing this mail are 5 patches for kexec userspace and two for the >> kernel. The first fixes an array overflow and the second updates >> userspace to the merged 2.6.28 kdump support. The remaining are >> cleanups and warning fixes, including one for the common code. >> >> The two patchs for the kernel are independent. > > Hi all, > > sorry to be a bit slow in responding, this email landed just > as I was leaving for a weeks holiday. > No problem, I figured as much. > The kexec-tools patches seem reasonable to me and I'm happy to merge > what I > think are the latest versions - thanks Michael for your review. > > Milton, here are the Subjects, Dates and Message-Ids of what I have in > my > queue. If you could confirm this or repost that would be great. > > #1 > Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools v2] ppc64: always check number of ranges > when adding them > Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:33:50 -0600 > Message-ID: <1231418030_141769 at mercury.realtime.net> > > #2 > Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 2/5] ppc64: update kdump for 2.6.28 > relocatable kernel > Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:42 -0600 > Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-2r.miltonm at bga.com> > > #3 > Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 3/5] ppc64: segments may be reordered > Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:45 -0600 > Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-3r.miltonm at bga.com> > > #4 > Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 4/5] ppc64: cleanups > Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:48 -0600 > Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-4r.miltonm at bga.com> > > #5 > Subject: [PATCH kexec-tools 5/5] entry wants to be void * > Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 15:04:51 -0600 > Message-Id: <kexec-29-1-5r.miltonm at bga.com> Based on the subjects, yes, those are the lastest versions. And I assume you saw Mohan's tested message. Thanks, milton
