On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Simon Horman<horms at verge.net.au> wrote: > I think you are understanding it right, that the current code fails > with no optimisation enabled because the unused function isn't optimised > away. Is there a reason you need -O0? It seems that fixing this is probably > more effort than its worth. I don't really need -O0, just happened to pass in a custom CFLAGS without -O2 to ./configure and then the code didn't compile. Now I know that I should include -O2 in the CFLAGS to make sure the code builds. If it should be fixed or not is a different question. I'm perfectly happy with things as-is! Cheers, / magnus
