On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 10:27:43AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 09:56 -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:25:34PM +0530, M. Mohan Kumar wrote: > > > > > Well it definately looks like removing that variable had some code changes. > > It'll take some time to match it up to source, but Most interesting I think is > > the variance in putprops around address f34. Looks like its doing some string > > maniuplation in a reversed order, using a huge offset. Might be worthwhile to > > check to see if theres any string overruns in this code. > > Yeah I still suspect it's just a bug in the code that's being exposed > now. > Hi, The same code works with gcc-3.4. > Mohan, can you try running it under valgrind? Still I am not able to use valgrind to debug kexec-tools Regards, M. Mohan Kumar.
