On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:08 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote: > On 04/02/2009 05:04 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 11:40 -0700, Geoff Levand wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I tried building kexec with gcc-4.3 from the cell sdk-3.1 > >> and the resulting binary didn't work correctly. It works > >> OK with the gcc-4.1 from the same (sdk-3.1). > > > > You mean building kexec-tools? Or building the kernel? > > The kexec program in kexec-tools. Right. In that case I'd guess there's a bug in the kexec-tools DT creation code, that's being exposed by the new gcc. If you compare the DT from a working and non-working version it shouldn't be too hard to track down. cheers -- Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/attachments/20090403/86714910/attachment.bin>
