Eduardo Habkost wrote: > Considering they touch both KVM and kexec, which tree would be best way > to get them in? > > kvm.git will be happy to hold these patches, provided they are acked by the relevant maintainer. > (Avi: the patches were sent only to kexec and kvm mailing lists, > initially. If it's better to submit them to your address also so it gets > on your queue, please let me know) > Please do copy me. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
