[patch] ia64: Order of operations bug in PT_LOAD segment reader

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> writes:

> The bug comes about because the break statment was never executed because
> the if clause would bever be true because the if clause will never be true
> because &  has higher precedence than !=.
                 ^^^^^^
                 lower

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab at suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra?e 5, 90409 N?rnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux