* Jamey Sharp [2008-06-02 18:43]: > > Oh, dear--that doesn't work. Thanks for catching that issue. But it also means that it *didn't* work on x86-64 because inb() needed to call a function (I don't think that the compiler did inline something when it even didn't know the prototype). My next patch should address that issue by just using the same header file for i386 and x86-64. No need for code duplication here. And I think we should use __always_inline__ in that case (yes, it's GNU only but I think we can afford that for kexec-tools) to make sure that the inlining takes also place for -O0.' Bernhard -- Bernhard Walle, SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Architecture Maintenance
