On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Andrew Morton wrote: > - * in interrupt context :) > + * Return true if we acquired the lock > */ > -static int kexec_lock; > +static inline bool kexec_trylock(void) > +{ > + return !test_and_set_bit(0, &kexec_bitlock); Nope. That needs to be an "unsigned long". But more importantl, why not just make it a lock in the first place? static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(kexec_lock); #define kexec_trylock() spin_trylock(&kexec_lock) #define kexec_unlock() spin_unlock(&kexec_lock) and then you get it all right and clear and obvious. Yeah, and I didn't check whether there is anything that is supposed to be able to sleep. If there is, use a mutex instead of a spinlock, of course. Linus