Cai, Any headway in this front ? Regards-- Subrata On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 05:11 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > Hi Cai, > > Some patches in Bits and Pieces regarding this nearby ? > > Regards-- > Subrata > > > > > Yes. Initally, I put this item to a relative low priority, partly > > because kdump config options and init scripts are tend to be > > distro-specific, so it won't be easy to write portable tests for > > different distros. In addition, lots of config options are not easy to > > be tested automately, like raw disk target, vfat disk target, and > > network target etc, as testers have to setup those name manually. But, > > you are right, those are high priority tests for kexec/kdump in distro > > release, we tested most of those options manually for RHEL anyway and we > > had some automated tests of it, which I'll try to submit to LTP as many > > as possible. For those manual tests, I'll also try to find some ways to > > automate them. For example, for different dump targets, it is possible > > to verify the generated initrd file as expected. > > > > > > > > > == increase coverages for new kexec/kdump development efforts == > > > > - new reserved region syntax in Kernel. > > > > > > Another important thing we need to focus on is driver testing. Drivers > > > can fail to initialize in second kernel and kdump will fail. Can we do > > > something so that we can do following. > > > > > > > That isn't something I have not thought of. For RHEL release testing, we > > will have a workflow to run those tests on any storage/network drivers, > > and it will report back testing results and driver matrix. However, this > > workflow is very distro-specific, and depends on the test farm it is > > using, so it does not make any sense to put it here. > > > > > - Collect the machine statistics on which kdump was tested and send > > > the reports to a common place. Especially capture the storage/network > > > driver data which can be probably be available through LTP site. > > > > > > > That sounds like a good idea to me. > > > > > - Also capture how much memory was reserved on what architecture and > > > whether it worked or not. This will help us verify for sure that how > > > much memory to reserve for second kernel on various architectures. > > > > > > > This is something could be done. I'll have a look at it. > > > > Thanks, > > CaiQian > > > > > Thanks > > > Vivek > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp-list at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
