On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 08:56:34AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 07:48:27PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > > elfcore header memory needs to be reserved in a crash kernel. > > This means that the relevant code should be protected > > by CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP rather than CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms at verge.net.au> > > > > --- > > Andrew, this patch fixes bug in the (unlikely) case where > > an ia64 crashdump kernel does not have CONFIG_PROC_FS set. > > I think it is worth including in 2.6.27. But breakage cases are > > likely to be minimal to non-existent, so I am comfortable > > with post 2.6.27 too. > > > > This patch should be appended to the series, > > "is_kdump_kernel() cleanup and related patches". > > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2008-July/002270.html > > > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c 2008-08-05 18:31:13.000000000 +1000 > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/ia64/kernel/efi.c 2008-08-05 18:31:21.000000000 +1000 > > @@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ kdump_find_rsvd_region (unsigned long si > > } > > #endif > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP > > /* locate the size find a the descriptor at a certain address */ > > unsigned long __init > > vmcore_find_descriptor_size (unsigned long address) > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c 2008-08-05 18:31:20.000000000 +1000 > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/ia64/kernel/setup.c 2008-08-05 18:31:21.000000000 +1000 > > @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ reserve_memory (void) > > } > > #endif > > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CRASH_KERNEL > > if (reserve_elfcorehdr(&rsvd_region[n].start, > > &rsvd_region[n].end) == 0) > > n++; > > Hi Simon, > > Thanks for the patch. One minor nit. I think compilation will fail > in the case of CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE=n. Because reserve_elfcorehdr will > try to use vmcore_unusabe() which is not available now? Yes, sorry. I forgot to send a revised version of the patch that creates vmcore_unusabe() so that it is present if CONFIG_PROC_VMCORE=n. I will do so.