On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:50:43 +0200 Bernhard Walle <bwalle at suse.de> wrote: > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820_32.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820_32.c > @@ -51,6 +51,13 @@ struct resource code_resource = { > .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_MEM > }; > > +struct resource bss_resource = { > + .name = "Kernel bss", > + .start = 0, > + .end = 0, > + .flags = IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_MEM > +}; > + > static struct resource system_rom_resource = { > .name = "System ROM", > .start = 0xf0000, > @@ -287,6 +294,7 @@ legacy_init_iomem_resources(struct resou > */ > request_resource(res, code_resource); > request_resource(res, data_resource); > + request_resource(res, &bss_resource); Looks ungainly, doesn't it? Perhaps we should add a third arg to legacy_init_iomem_resources(), or change legacy_init_iomem_resources() to take zero args?