On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:42:39PM +0900, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > > Hi, > > 2007/04/26 19:40:42 +0530, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal at in.ibm.com> wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 03:10:33PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I think one plan of moving the kexec stuff from fastboot to the new > >> kexec mailing list was to make this list superflous due to a high > >> amount of spam traffic. > >> > >> But where should makedumpfile issues go to? > > > >I think kexec list should be good for this too. Anyway we are discussing > >kdump also on kexec list and makedumpfile is so closely related to > >kdump. > > I hope so. > I would like to discuss makedumpfile on kexec list because it is not > much traffic about makedumpfile and it is related to kdump as Vivek said. kexec may not have been entirely the best name for the list, but at least its kind of short :-) I think its entirely appropriate for discussions of kdump and makedumpfile to be carried out on the kexec@ list. In fact, anything related to kexec and crash analysis tht was on fastboot@ is more than welcome on the kexec list in my book.
