Re: [Resend] 3.2-rc6+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/21/2011 05:24 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> [Evidently, vger has blocked the previous attempts to post this message
> for some reason.  I wonder why?]
> 
> This message contains a list of some regressions from 3.0 and 3.1
> for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
> 
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 3.0 and 3.1, please let us
> know either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know if any of
> the entries below are invalid.
> 
> The entries below are simplified and the statistics are not present due to the
> continuing Bugzilla outage.
> 
> 
> Subject    : 3.2-rc2: regression after hibernate: lots of warnings, broken 
> system
> Submitter  : Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
> Date       : 2011-11-24 15:40
> Message-ID : 20111124154014.GA2153@xxxxxxxxxx
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=132214929818015&w=2
> 


This one looks a bit similar to the one reported at
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1230509/ which is fixed by
commit 29495aa04a30c21565243c5b9c028510446d242c.

 

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux