Re: 3.2-rc2+: Reported regressions from 3.0 and 3.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:19:24 +0530 "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Subject    : khugepaged blocks suspend2ram (3.2.0-rc1-00252-g8f042aa)
> > Submitter  : Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date       : 2011-11-12 10:48
> > Message-ID : 20111112104859.7744b282@xxxxxxx
> > References : https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/12/11
> > 
> 
> Andrea's patch already fixes this issue, which was reported first by
> Jiri Slaby. https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/11/93
> I remember Andrew Morton taking this patch in his -mm tree. But it is
> not in mainline yet. So can we consider this closed or not?

grr, nothing in that patch's changelog indicates that it fixed a
regression nor that it fixed an infinite blockage of suspend.

I moved it to my 3.2 queue, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux